lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1d3f23370908092328l6e980f3ft2d5a8f8f37c26fcf@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Mon, 10 Aug 2009 16:28:22 +1000
From:	John Williams <john.williams@...alogix.com>
To:	Michal Simek <michal.simek@...alogix.com>,
	John Linn <John.Linn@...inx.com>,
	David DeBonis <david.debonis@...inx.com>
Cc:	microblaze-uclinux@...e.uq.edu.au,
	Linux Kernel list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Rethinking MicroBlaze commandline precedence

Hi,

Currently, MicroBlaze commandline handling in order of lowest to
highest priority, looks like this:

1. pointer in r5 from bootloader
2. CONFIG_CMDLINE=...
3. "chosen" section in DTS/DT
4. CONFIG_CMDLINE=... && CONFIG_CMDLINE_FORCE

I'm wondering if a cmdline in r5 should override the DTS.  My thinking
is based on two observations:

(a) not everyone will use a bootloader like u-boot that can manipulate
DTBs easily before kernel boot
(b) a custom cmdline string in r5 allows the latest possible binding
(runtime), where as the DTB is typically created at compile time.

So, how about this order instead:

1. CONFIG_CMDLINE=...
2. "chosen" section in DTS/DT
3. pointer in r5 from bootloader
4. CONFIG_CMDLINE=... and CONFIG_CMDLINE_FORCE

Then, apart from CMDLINE_FORCE, the precedence goes from earliest
binding (kernel build) to latest (runtime via bootloader/r5).

Thoughts?

John
-- 
John Williams, PhD, B.Eng, B.IT
PetaLogix - Linux Solutions for a Reconfigurable World
w: www.petalogix.com  p: +61-7-30090663  f: +61-7-30090663
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ