[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1d3f23370908092328l6e980f3ft2d5a8f8f37c26fcf@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2009 16:28:22 +1000
From: John Williams <john.williams@...alogix.com>
To: Michal Simek <michal.simek@...alogix.com>,
John Linn <John.Linn@...inx.com>,
David DeBonis <david.debonis@...inx.com>
Cc: microblaze-uclinux@...e.uq.edu.au,
Linux Kernel list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Rethinking MicroBlaze commandline precedence
Hi,
Currently, MicroBlaze commandline handling in order of lowest to
highest priority, looks like this:
1. pointer in r5 from bootloader
2. CONFIG_CMDLINE=...
3. "chosen" section in DTS/DT
4. CONFIG_CMDLINE=... && CONFIG_CMDLINE_FORCE
I'm wondering if a cmdline in r5 should override the DTS. My thinking
is based on two observations:
(a) not everyone will use a bootloader like u-boot that can manipulate
DTBs easily before kernel boot
(b) a custom cmdline string in r5 allows the latest possible binding
(runtime), where as the DTB is typically created at compile time.
So, how about this order instead:
1. CONFIG_CMDLINE=...
2. "chosen" section in DTS/DT
3. pointer in r5 from bootloader
4. CONFIG_CMDLINE=... and CONFIG_CMDLINE_FORCE
Then, apart from CMDLINE_FORCE, the precedence goes from earliest
binding (kernel build) to latest (runtime via bootloader/r5).
Thoughts?
John
--
John Williams, PhD, B.Eng, B.IT
PetaLogix - Linux Solutions for a Reconfigurable World
w: www.petalogix.com p: +61-7-30090663 f: +61-7-30090663
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists