lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090809130054.GA1362@ucw.cz>
Date:	Sun, 9 Aug 2009 15:01:16 +0200
From:	Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>
To:	Trilok Soni <soni.trilok@...il.com>
Cc:	Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>,
	kernel list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	swetland@...gle.com, linux-input@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: HTC Dream for staging: add support for input on GPIO pins

On Mon 2009-08-10 13:01:28, Trilok Soni wrote:
> Hi Pavel,
> 

> >> I don't see any importance of gpio_matrix.c when we already have
> >> generic gpio matrix driver mainlined. I would suggest to remove those
> >> bits from this patch. I have added linux-input ML.
> >
> > Well, I'm trying for staging merge at this point. Reasons why
> > gpio_matrix is there are:
> >
> > 1) it is non-trivial to remove
> >
> > 2) it has some features mainline lacks
> >
> > 3) HTC Dream actually works with it
> >
> > (and 4) I'd like to submit code as Arve wrote it, then transform/clean
> > it up in staging).
> >
> > Of course, relevant features will need to be extracted from
> > gpio_matrix and merged at the right places, and that needs to happen
> > before move from staging/, but I'd like to have working keyboard in
> > the meantime.
> 
> gpio_matrix in mainline should work with HTC G1 with few proper
> platform data and input name eventhough ghost key clearance code is
> not yet in mainline driver.

I actually tried to write that platform hooks, but unfortunately I'm
quite far from being able to test them. 

> I know you want HTC dream to work through staging but I would prefer
> that such drivers should be discussed and reviewed on
> linux-input/linux-kernel ML and not just dumped in staging.

The stuff I'm submitting is not ready for proper review. It will take
a while before it is good enough. But I believe it has place in
staging: it will allow me to get Dream into usable state, and will
allow others to help with cleanups.

Of course, it will get proper review before moving to drivers/input.
									Pavel
-- 
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ