linux-kernel - [PATCH 4/3] perf_counter: Correct PERF_SAMPLE

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1249896447.17467.74.camel@twins>
Date:	Mon, 10 Aug 2009 11:27:27 +0200
From:	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To:	Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
Cc:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...hat.com>,
	Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>,
	Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>
Subject: [PATCH 4/3] perf_counter: Correct PERF_SAMPLE_RAW output

Subject: perf_counter: Correct PERF_SAMPLE_RAW output
From: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
Date: Mon Aug 10 11:16:52 CEST 2009

PERF_SAMPLE_* output switches should unconditionally output the
correct format, as they are the only way to unambiguously parse the
PERF_EVENT_SAMPLE data.

Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
---
 include/linux/perf_counter.h |    2 ++
 include/trace/ftrace.h       |    3 ++-
 kernel/perf_counter.c        |   30 ++++++++++++++++++++++++------
 3 files changed, 28 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

Index: linux-2.6/include/linux/perf_counter.h
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.orig/include/linux/perf_counter.h
+++ linux-2.6/include/linux/perf_counter.h
@@ -369,6 +369,8 @@ enum perf_event_type {
 	 *
 	 *	{ u64			nr,
 	 *	  u64			ips[nr];  } && PERF_SAMPLE_CALLCHAIN
+	 *	{ u32			size;
+	 *	  char                  data[size];}&& PERF_SAMPLE_RAW
 	 * };
 	 */
 	PERF_EVENT_SAMPLE		= 9,
Index: linux-2.6/include/trace/ftrace.h
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.orig/include/trace/ftrace.h
+++ linux-2.6/include/trace/ftrace.h
@@ -687,7 +687,8 @@ static void ftrace_profile_##call(proto)
 	pc = preempt_count();						\
 									\
 	__data_size = ftrace_get_offsets_##call(&__data_offsets, args); \
-	__entry_size = ALIGN(__data_size + sizeof(*entry), sizeof(u64));\
+	__entry_size = ALIGN(__data_size + sizeof(*entry) + sizeof(u32),\
+			     sizeof(u64));				\
 									\
 	do {								\
 		char raw_data[__entry_size];				\
Index: linux-2.6/kernel/perf_counter.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.orig/kernel/perf_counter.c
+++ linux-2.6/kernel/perf_counter.c
@@ -2647,7 +2647,6 @@ void perf_counter_output(struct perf_cou
 		u64 counter;
 	} group_entry;
 	struct perf_callchain_entry *callchain = NULL;
-	struct perf_raw_record *raw = NULL;
 	int callchain_size = 0;
 	u64 time;
 	struct {
@@ -2717,9 +2716,15 @@ void perf_counter_output(struct perf_cou
 	}
 
 	if (sample_type & PERF_SAMPLE_RAW) {
-		raw = data->raw;
-		if (raw)
-			header.size += raw->size;
+		int size = sizeof(u32);
+
+		if (data->raw)
+			size += data->raw->size;
+		else
+			size += sizeof(u32);
+
+		WARN_ON_ONCE(size & (sizeof(u64)-1));
+		header.size += size;
 	}
 
 	ret = perf_output_begin(&handle, counter, header.size, nmi, 1);
@@ -2785,8 +2790,21 @@ void perf_counter_output(struct perf_cou
 		}
 	}
 
-	if ((sample_type & PERF_SAMPLE_RAW) && raw)
-		perf_output_copy(&handle, raw->data, raw->size);
+	if (sample_type & PERF_SAMPLE_RAW) {
+		if (data->raw) {
+			perf_output_put(&handle, data->raw->size);
+			perf_output_copy(&handle, data->raw->data, data->raw->size);
+		} else {
+			struct {
+				u32	size;
+				u32	data;
+			} raw = {
+				.size = sizeof(u32),
+				.data = 0,
+			};
+			perf_output_put(&handle, raw);
+		}
+	}
 
 	perf_output_end(&handle);
 }

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/