[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <200908101505.36414.a1426z@gawab.com>
Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2009 15:05:36 +0300
From: Al Boldi <a1426z@...ab.com>
To: Scott James Remnant <scott@...ntu.com>
Cc: Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>, Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>,
Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Kay Sievers <kay.sievers@...y.org>,
Jan Blunck <jblunck@...e.de>, gregkh@...e.de,
Harald Hoyer <harald@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Driver Core: devtmpfs - kernel-maintained tmpfs-based /dev
Scott James Remnant wrote:
> On Thu, 2009-08-06 at 23:18 +0300, Al Boldi wrote:
> > Maybe they are using the same trick as Ubuntu and Debian, as they run
> > udev in the background to hide the slowness. Both Fedora and Mandriva
> > run udev in the foreground where the slowness is visible.
>
> Ubuntu does not run udev in the background.
I put a date timestamp at the beginning and end of the start command of
init.d/udev, and when you stop and then start init.d/udev it shows a ~5s
delay. At boot I don't see this delay, but instead see the initial date
stamp, then a flurry of parallel activity, then the final date stamp, which
shows the ~5s delay.
Thanks!
--
Al
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists