linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/3] libata: add support for blk-iopoll

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 10 Aug 2009 11:15:23 -0600
From:	Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>
To:	Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@...cle.com>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org,
	Eric.Moore@....com, jeff@...zik.org,
	Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@...cle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] libata: add support for blk-iopoll

Hey, Jens,

I'm a little slow in looking at this, hopefully it's not completely
noise...

> @@ -2157,7 +2194,12 @@ static irqreturn_t ahci_interrupt(int irq, void *dev_instance)
>  
>  		ap = host->ports[i];
>  		if (ap) {
> -			ahci_port_intr(ap);
> +			if (!blk_iopoll_enabled)
> +				ahci_port_intr(ap);
> +			else if (blk_iopoll_sched_prep(&ap->iopoll)) {
> +				ap_irq_disable(ap);
> +				blk_iopoll_sched(&ap->iopoll);
> +			}
>  			VPRINTK("port %u\n", i);
>  		} else {
>  			VPRINTK("port %u (no irq)\n", i);

It seems to me that, if blk_iopoll_sched_prep() fails, the interrupt
will be dropped on the floor; would you not need an explicit
ahci_port_intr() call in that case too?  Unless I've misunderstood as
usual...

Documenting the "zero means failure" nature of blk_iopoll_sched_prep()
might also be a good idea; I predict confusion otherwise.

jon
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/