[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1249933887.2501.62.camel@dhcp231-106.rdu.redhat.com>
Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2009 15:51:27 -0400
From: Eric Paris <eparis@...hat.com>
To: Vegard Nossum <vegard.nossum@...il.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, penberg@...helsinki.fi, mingo@...e.hu
Subject: Re: kmemcheck in linux-next causes NULL pointer dereference at
task_rq_lock
On Mon, 2009-08-10 at 20:56 +0200, Vegard Nossum wrote:
> 2009/8/10 Eric Paris <eparis@...hat.com>:
> > I'm using 2.6.31-rc5-next-20090810 on a vmware server. Originally I saw
> > messages about setting to one cpu, so I booted with maxcpu=1. I get
> > this same panic with and without maxpu. Booting with kmemcheck=0 boots
> > just fine.
> >
> > I have not tested kmemcheck in linus' tree but will start looking for a
> > working version now. Any suggestions or things I should try?
>
> Hi, thanks for the report, and for trying it out.
>
> Does it crash with "kmemcheck=0 maxcpus=1" (it should be maxcpus, not
> maxcpu). This should be a simple way of determining whether it was
> kmemcheck or the existing maxcpus code, which we use, that broke.
I boots fine with kmemcheck=0
I did get the command line right. maxcpus=1 kmemcheck=1 was the panic I
showed in the last message.
> If you can send config (off-list, probably), I will try to reproduce
> and investigate more tomorrow.
Will send it now.
Thanks.
-Eric
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists