[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20090810105851.80333493.sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2009 10:58:51 +1000
From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@...ldses.org>
Cc: linux-next@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
NeilBrown <neilb@...e.de>,
Trond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@...app.com>
Subject: linux-next: manual merge of the nfsd tree with the nfs tree
Hi Bruce,
Today's linux-next merge of the nfsd tree got a conflict in
net/sunrpc/cache.c between commit
173912a6add00f4715774dcecf9ee53274c5924c ("SUNRPC: Move procfs-specific
stuff out of the generic sunrpc cache code") from the nfs tree and commit
f866a8194f7cbabb9135b98b9ac7d26237b88367 ("sunrpc/cache: rename
queue_loose to cache_dequeue") from the nfsd tree.
Just context changes. I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as
necessary.
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell sfr@...b.auug.org.au
diff --cc net/sunrpc/cache.c
index db7720e,d19c075..0000000
--- a/net/sunrpc/cache.c
+++ b/net/sunrpc/cache.c
@@@ -884,7 -908,19 +884,7 @@@ static int cache_release(struct inode *
- static void queue_loose(struct cache_detail *detail, struct cache_head *ch)
-static const struct file_operations cache_file_operations = {
- .owner = THIS_MODULE,
- .llseek = no_llseek,
- .read = cache_read,
- .write = cache_write,
- .poll = cache_poll,
- .ioctl = cache_ioctl, /* for FIONREAD */
- .open = cache_open,
- .release = cache_release,
-};
-
-
+ static void cache_dequeue(struct cache_detail *detail, struct cache_head *ch)
{
struct cache_queue *cq;
spin_lock(&queue_lock);
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists