linux-kernel - Re: drivers/pci/quirks.c: irq_reroute

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 11 Aug 2009 14:36:05 +0200
From:	Olaf Dabrunz <Olaf.Dabrunz@....net>
To:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Cc:	Stefan Assmann <sassmann@...hat.com>, Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>,
	Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@...tuousgeek.org>,
	Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
	the arch/x86 maintainers <x86@...nel.org>,
	Olaf Dabrunz <Olaf.Dabrunz@....net>
Subject: Re: drivers/pci/quirks.c: irq_reroute_variant is dead code?

On 11-Aug-09, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> 
> * Stefan Assmann <sassmann@...hat.com> wrote:
> 
> > On 10.08.2009 18:32, Jesse Barnes wrote:
> >> [Corrected Stefan's address.]
> >
> > Thanks Jesse! CCing Olaf as well.
> >
> >> On Sat, 8 Aug 2009 16:45:20 +0200
> >> Ingo Molnar<mingo@...e.hu>  wrote:
> >>
> >>> * Jesse Barnes<jbarnes@...tuousgeek.org>  wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> On Tue, 28 Jul 2009 12:50:08 -0700
> >>>> Jeremy Fitzhardinge<jeremy@...p.org>  wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>> quirk_reroute_to_boot_interrupts_intel() goes to some effort to
> >>>>> scan for a bunch of Intel devices and set
> >>>>> dev->irq_reroute_variant = INTEL_IRQ_REROUTE_VARIANT.  However,
> >>>>> as far as I can see that's the only reference to
> >>>>> dev->irq_reroute_variant and INTEL_IRQ_REROUTE_VARIANT, so the
> >>>>> whole thing appears to have no effect.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Is it all dead code?  Is there something else which should be
> >>>>> there missing?
> >>>> Hm my quick look couldn't find a user either.  The initial patch
> >>>> to add that stuff (e1d3a90846b40ad3160bf4b648d36c6badad39ac) had
> >>>> an ACPI component, but it looks like that may have vanished
> >>>> somehow (maybe some of the IOAPIC code got shuffled around and
> >>>> this bit was missed?).
> >>>>
> >>>> Stefan or Ingo?
> >>> I dont remember ioapic interactions. Stefan?
> >>>
> >>> 	Ingo
> >>>
> >
> > Actually the ACPI part of the commit got trashed by some major 
> > ACPI rewrite. [...]
> 
> Yeah, i remember some larger reject resolved by Len i think, about 
> two cycles ago, in this area. So we probably lost those bits there - 
> i've Cc:-ed Len.
> 
> There's no urgency in terms of v2.6.31 (since we never really 
> exposed this new functionality in a new release), but it would be 
> nice to get to the bottom of this.

Yep, that would be nice.

I was made aware of that problem early this year when the ACPI code
change was made. Since then I heard that someone already wrote some
patch for the boot IRQ quirks. But obviously that referred to some other
part of the quirk. Stefan?

As I am currently unemployed, demotivated and trying to get my work on
fctrace going again (as well as to get the rest of my life in order),
it seems I have no time to fix this. I would love to, really. We need to
get these quirks in, and I would like to discuss how to do this The Right
Way with the rewritten ACPI code (and the existing MP code).

Regards,

-- 
Olaf Dabrunz (Olaf.Dabrunz <at> gmx.net)

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/