[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090811073411.GB17476@elte.hu>
Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2009 09:34:11 +0200
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>
Cc: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@...tuousgeek.org>, mingo@...hat.com,
hpa@...or.com, suresh.b.siddha@...el.com, tglx@...utronix.de,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
"linux-pci@...r.kernel.org" <linux-pci@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] pci/intr_remapping: allocate irq_iommu on node -v2
* Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org> wrote:
> static struct irq_2_iommu *irq_2_iommu_alloc(unsigned int irq)
> {
> - return irq_2_iommu_alloc_node(irq, cpu_to_node(boot_cpu_id));
> + int node;
> +
> +#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
> + node = irq_to_desc(irq)->node;
> +#else
> + node = cpu_to_node(boot_cpu_id);
> +#endif
> +
> + return irq_2_iommu_alloc_node(irq, node);
> }
To avoid the ifdef, shouldnt there be an new irq_node(irq) primitive
that maps to desc->node on SMP and does the right thing on UP?
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists