linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH][RFC] security: constify seq

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <alpine.LRH.2.00.0908120129290.22015@tundra.namei.org>
Date:	Wed, 12 Aug 2009 01:32:27 +1000 (EST)
From:	James Morris <jmorris@...ei.org>
To:	"Serge E. Hallyn" <serue@...ibm.com>
cc:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
	Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>,
	kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH][RFC] security: constify seq_operations

On Tue, 11 Aug 2009, Serge E. Hallyn wrote:

> seq_ops structs not constified...  something as simple as
> find . -type f -print0 | xargs -0 grep 'struct seq_operations' | grep -v const
> Though what you have here hits all of those and more.

There might be some docs to update to get people to think about it.

> Acked-by: Serge Hallyn <serue@...ibm.com>

Christoph kind of acked it off-list, but wasn't sure about the security: 
tag.  I suppose it could be seq_file: ?

-- 
James Morris
<jmorris@...ei.org>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/