[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.44L0.0908111148060.2562-100000@iolanthe.rowland.org>
Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2009 11:53:57 -0400 (EDT)
From: Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
cc: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@...el.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-pm <linux-pm@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
linux-acpi <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>, Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>,
Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...ux.intel.com>,
"dtor@...l.ru" <dtor@...l.ru>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 0/4] introduce device async actions mechanism
On Tue, 11 Aug 2009, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> In fact, we don't need the layers at all. The only thing we have to assure is
> that, during resume, the devices given device depends on will be handled
> before we start to handle this particular device (inversely during suspend).
>
> Please note that we're not even allowed to start executing the device's
> resume callback before the callbacks of the devices it depends on have
> returned (the same applies to the suspend callbacks, but the other way around).
The general algorithm for maximum parallelism goes as follows: Start by
resuming (in parallel) all the devices which don't depend on anything
else. Each time a resume finishes, you go on to resume (in parallel)
all the devices which depend only on resumed devices and which haven't
yet started to resume.
As described, this can require a large number of threads. It also
requires detailed knowledge of which devices depend on others, which we
don't have.
Alan Stern
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists