linux-kernel - Re: Question about userspace-consumer

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20090811204006.GA13969@gandalf>
Date:	Tue, 11 Aug 2009 23:40:06 +0300
From:	Felipe Balbi <me@...ipebalbi.com>
To:	Mark Brown <broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Cc:	Mike Rapoport <mike@...pulab.co.il>, me@...ipebalbi.com,
	Liam Girdwood <lrg@...mlogic.co.uk>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Question about userspace-consumer

On Tue, Aug 11, 2009 at 01:56:03PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 11, 2009 at 03:09:08PM +0300, Mike Rapoport wrote:
> > Felipe Balbi wrote:
> 
> > > that said, power supply framework and regulator framework seem to be
> > > well enough for implementing the basic support for SBS-enabled charging
> > > scheme.
> 
> > As far as I understood SBS scheme, the host has very little impact on the
> > charging process. Most of the charging is handled by Smart Battery and Smart
> > Battery Charger without any host intervention.
> 
> I strongly suspect that in at least some designs the battery charger
> itself will be at least partially dumb and the battery charger part of
> the spec done by software running on the host CPU - there's examples in
> the spec which seem to back that up.

and that's what I was talking about. I'll reply more to the other
subthread.

-- 
balbi
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/