linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/1] Power: fix suspend vt regression

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <4A81E073.5080703@gmail.com>
Date:	Tue, 11 Aug 2009 23:19:47 +0200
From:	Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@...il.com>
To:	Greg KH <gregkh@...e.de>
CC:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Alan Cox <alan@...ux.intel.com>,
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] Power: fix suspend vt regression

On 08/11/2009 07:00 PM, Greg KH wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 11, 2009 at 10:41:33AM +0200, Jiri Slaby wrote:
>> vt_waitactive no longer accepts console parameter as console-1
>> since commit "vt: add an event interface". It expects console
>> number directly (as viewed by userspace -- counting from 1).
> 
> As the event interface code is only in -next and not in mainline, this
> doesn't pertain to Linus's current tree, right?

Correct. But please ignore this one. The comment above is correct, but
the change should have been done one level deeper. A new patch for this
will follow.

However there is still a race or something. Sometimes the suspend goes
through, sometimes it doesn't. I will investigate this further.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/