[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20090811145258.6cd823d6.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2009 14:52:58 -0700
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: "NeilBrown" <neilb@...e.de>
Cc: sage@...dream.net, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-raid@...r.kernel.org, stable@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] md: avoid use of broken kzalloc mempool
On Tue, 4 Aug 2009 08:03:52 +1000 (EST)
"NeilBrown" <neilb@...e.de> wrote:
> On Tue, August 4, 2009 6:54 am, Sage Weil wrote:
> > The kzalloc mempool does not re-zero items that have been used and then
> > returned to the pool. Manually zero the allocated multipath_bh instead.
> >
> > CC: linux-raid@...r.kernel.org
> > CC: Neil Brown <neilb@...e.de>
> > CC: <stable@...nel.org>
Sage, why did you cc stable@...nel.org? The patch fixes some bug?
What is it? Why is the fix sufficiently important to warrant
backporting?
> Acked-by: NeilBrown <neilb@...e.de>
>
Thanks, I'll merge it once the above is understood.
>
> In fact, you don't even need the memset. After allocation
> no assumptions are made about the content of the structure.
> Every field is immediately initialised except retry_list, which
> is never accessed until after the object is placed on a list.h list.
>
> So this code never needed kzalloc_pool.
Well, that's a bit of a functional change so let us (ie: you ;)) do
that separately?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists