linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 05/12] update FTRACE_SYSCALL

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20090811110023.GC4938@nowhere>
Date:	Tue, 11 Aug 2009 13:00:25 +0200
From:	Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
To:	Jason Baron <jbaron@...hat.com>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, mingo@...e.hu, laijs@...fujitsu.com,
	rostedt@...dmis.org, peterz@...radead.org,
	mathieu.desnoyers@...ymtl.ca, jiayingz@...gle.com,
	mbligh@...gle.com, lizf@...fujitsu.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 05/12] update FTRACE_SYSCALL_MAX

On Mon, Aug 10, 2009 at 04:52:35PM -0400, Jason Baron wrote:
> update FTRACE_SYSCALL_MAX to the current number of syscalls
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jason Baron <jbaron@...hat.com>
> 
> ---
>  arch/x86/include/asm/ftrace.h |    4 ++--
>  1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/ftrace.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/ftrace.h
> index bd2c651..7113654 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/ftrace.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/ftrace.h
> @@ -30,9 +30,9 @@
>  
>  /* FIXME: I don't want to stay hardcoded */
>  #ifdef CONFIG_X86_64
> -# define FTRACE_SYSCALL_MAX     296
> +# define FTRACE_SYSCALL_MAX     299
>  #else
> -# define FTRACE_SYSCALL_MAX     333
> +# define FTRACE_SYSCALL_MAX     337
>  #endif


I don't remember why we had to use a hardcoded number.
Is there no way to keep being sync with the current number of
syscalls? We dwant to avoid patching the kernel each time we
have a new syscall :-)

  
>  #ifdef CONFIG_FUNCTION_TRACER
> -- 
> 1.6.2.5
> 

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/