linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/3]: blk-iopoll, a polled completion API for block devices

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <e2e108260908110335tc500412mc6354359d85ae9b6@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Tue, 11 Aug 2009 12:35:13 +0200
From:	Bart Van Assche <bart.vanassche@...il.com>
To:	Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@...cle.com>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org,
	Eric.Moore@....com, jeff@...zik.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3]: blk-iopoll, a polled completion API for block 
	devices

On Thu, Aug 6, 2009 at 9:58 PM, Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@...cle.com> wrote:
> Anyway, YMMV, I would appreciate some test results (and as usual, that
> even includes just saying that it boots and functions for you). If
> people feel adventurous, patches for other controllers will be happily
> queued up for testing. I may even be convinced to implement support
> for your controller of choice, if you have some fast storage hooked up
> and would like to experiment. Generally, adding support to a driver is
> not very hard and the two conversions included were also meant to serve
> as an inspiration.

Sounds very interesting. Have you already considered patching the SRP
initiator ? During the SRP performance tests I ran CPU usage on the
initiator was more than 95% and on the target less than 10%.

Bart.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/