[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090812090234.GB14114@elte.hu>
Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2009 11:02:34 +0200
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
Cc: eranian@...il.com, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Robert Richter <robert.richter@....com>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>,
Maynard Johnson <mpjohn@...ibm.com>,
Carl Love <cel@...ibm.com>,
Corey J Ashford <cjashfor@...ibm.com>,
Philip Mucci <mucci@...s.utk.edu>,
Dan Terpstra <terpstra@...s.utk.edu>,
perfmon2-devel <perfmon2-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net>
Subject: Re: perf_counters issue with PERF_SAMPLE_GROUP
* Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl> wrote:
> On Tue, 2009-08-11 at 23:08 +0200, stephane eranian wrote:
>
> > But aren't you going to change the cpu, pid target stuff we
> > discussed a couple of weeks ago anyway?
>
> Right, I'd like to, but Ingo doesn't. I haven't heard back from
> Paul on this.
Not sure we want to change it. Mixing PID and CPU into the same
space disallows the simultaneous application of both. I.e. right now
we allow 3 models:
- PID-ish
- CPU-ish
- PID and CPU [say measure CPU#2 component of an inherited workload.]
Also, i dont really see the use-cases for new targets. (i've seen a
few mentioned but none seemed valid) What new targets do people have
in mind?
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists