[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <m1eirhlryf.fsf@fess.ebiederm.org>
Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2009 18:51:52 -0700
From: ebiederm@...ssion.com (Eric W. Biederman)
To: Amerigo Wang <amwang@...hat.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-ia64@...r.kernel.org,
Neil Horman <nhorman@...hat.com>,
Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Subject: Re: [RFC Patch 1/2] kexec: show memory info in /proc/iomem
Amerigo Wang <amwang@...hat.com> writes:
>> Nacked-by: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>
>>
>> We can inspect the image we are going to load to get this information.
>> In fact /sbin/kexec already inspects the image we are going to load
>> to get this information. Putting this in the kernel adds kernel
>> complexity for no gain.
>>
>
> /sbin/kexec is supported to know this, of course. But this is not for
> /sbin/kexec, this is for user (or other programs) to observe the memory
> information, so that he can know the memory he reserved is too much or not.
> Without this, it is a little hard to use patch 2/2.
So add on option to /sbin/kexec.
Furthermore none of this does a good job of predicting how much
memory /sbin/fsck will require to check the filesystem before we
write a crash dump.
The only way I know of reliably obtaining that kind of information is
testing your crash userspace with different amounts of memory and
understanding what is going on.
Eric
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists