[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4A8225DB.8040008@redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2009 10:15:55 +0800
From: Amerigo Wang <amwang@...hat.com>
To: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>
CC: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-ia64@...r.kernel.org,
Neil Horman <nhorman@...hat.com>,
Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Subject: Re: [RFC Patch 1/2] kexec: show memory info in /proc/iomem
Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> Amerigo Wang <amwang@...hat.com> writes:
>
>
>>> Nacked-by: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>
>>>
>>> We can inspect the image we are going to load to get this information.
>>> In fact /sbin/kexec already inspects the image we are going to load
>>> to get this information. Putting this in the kernel adds kernel
>>> complexity for no gain.
>>>
>>>
>> /sbin/kexec is supported to know this, of course. But this is not for
>> /sbin/kexec, this is for user (or other programs) to observe the memory
>> information, so that he can know the memory he reserved is too much or not.
>>
>
>
>> Without this, it is a little hard to use patch 2/2.
>>
>
> So add on option to /sbin/kexec.
>
This can be another choice.
> Furthermore none of this does a good job of predicting how much
> memory /sbin/fsck will require to check the filesystem before we
> write a crash dump.
>
No one actually knows this without testing... But if 128M on x86 is
still not enough, that is probably a bug of fsck, not our fault.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists