[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4A82C3C6.5010302@vflare.org>
Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2009 18:59:42 +0530
From: Nitin Gupta <ngupta@...are.org>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
CC: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] swap: send callback when swap slot is freed
On 08/12/2009 06:26 PM, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> * Nitin Gupta<ngupta@...are.org> wrote:
>
>> (Re-sending since I didn't get any reply last time)
>>
>> Currently, we have "swap discard" mechanism which sends a discard
>> bio request when we find a free cluster during scan_swap_map().
>> This callback can come a long time after swap slots are actually
>> freed.
>>
>> This delay in callback is a great problem when (compressed) RAM
>> [1] is used as a swap device. So, this change adds a callback
>> which is called as soon as a swap slot becomes free. For above
>> mentioned case of swapping over compressed RAM device, this is
>> very useful since we can immediately free memory allocated for
>> this swap page.
>>
>> This callback does not replace swap discard support. It is called
>> with swap_lock held, so it is meant to trigger action that
>> finishes quickly. However, swap discard is an I/O request and can
>> be used for taking longer actions.
<snip>
>
> Shouldnt this be all be unconditional? Sounds like a reasonable VM
> callback. The patch would become a lot smaller as well.
>
I also think this can be made unconditional as it makes the patch
much cleaner. I made it conditional just to be on path of least
resistance :)
Thanks for looking into this. I will resend the patch removing
all the #ifdef'ery.
Nitin
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists