[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090812135954.GA2711@redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2009 09:59:54 -0400
From: Jason Baron <jbaron@...hat.com>
To: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Lai Jiangshan <laijs@...fujitsu.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...ymtl.ca>,
Jiaying Zhang <jiayingz@...gle.com>,
Martin Bligh <mbligh@...gle.com>,
Li Zefan <lizf@...fujitsu.com>,
Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] tracing: Syscalls trace events + perf support
On Wed, Aug 12, 2009 at 01:33:09PM +0200, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 12, 2009 at 01:03:07PM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> >
> > one thing i noticed is that we dont seem to be catching
> > compat syscalls properly:
>
>
> Oh right. While looking at fs/compat.c, it seems most of the
> compat syscalls haven't been defined through the SYSCALL_DEFINE
> macro.
>
> Grr...
>
right. I mentioned this in a pervious mail that we weren't handling
compat syscalls. That said, the pervious syscall tracer also had the
same issue, so we haven't taken a step back. I guess we need to convert
some of the compat layer to use the DEFINE_SYSCALL() macros. Also, there
are a number of 64-bit syscalls that don't use DEFINE_SYSCALL either.
Those need to converted as well. The patchset I submitted converted a
couple of them....
thanks,
-Jason
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists