[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1250091558.20332.63.camel@pc1117.cambridge.arm.com>
Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2009 16:39:17 +0100
From: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: kmemleak: Protect the seq start/next/stop sequence by
rcu_read_lock()
On Wed, 2009-08-12 at 08:32 -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
>
> On Wed, 12 Aug 2009, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> >
> > If the object size is bigger than a predefined value (4K in this case),
> > release the object lock during scanning and call cond_resched().
>
> What guarantees that the object isn't released during this?
There is no guarantee but the while() loop rechecks that object->flags
still has the OBJECT_ALLOCATED bit set after every cond_resched():
+ while (start < end && (object->flags & OBJECT_ALLOCATED)) {
+ scan_block(start, min(start + MAX_SCAN_SIZE, end),
+ object, 0);
+ start += MAX_SCAN_SIZE;
+
+ spin_unlock_irqrestore(&object->lock, flags);
+ cond_resched();
+ spin_lock_irqsave(&object->lock, flags);
+ }
It seems to be working fine with LTP running in parallel with kmemleak
scanning for nearly a day.
--
Catalin
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists