[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090812182013.GJ28848@basil.fritz.box>
Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2009 12:21:45 -0700
From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
To: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
CC: "Wang, Shane" <shane.wang@...el.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
"Cihula, Joseph" <joseph.cihula@...el.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"arjan@...ux.intel.com" <arjan@...ux.intel.com>,
"chrisw@...s-sol.org" <chrisw@...s-sol.org>,
"jmorris@...ei.org" <jmorris@...ei.org>,
"jbeulich@...ell.com" <jbeulich@...ell.com>,
"peterm@...hat.com" <peterm@...hat.com>,
"Wei, Gang" <gang.wei@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC v6][PATCH 0b/4] intel_txt: Intel(R) Trusted Execution
Technology support for Linux - Details
Right, that was the point.
Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org> wrote:
>> The question is: if the user doesn't want S3, do they still need to
>> enable S3 in order to be able to use TXT? Otherwise, this code needs to
>> be properly conditionalized.
>
>I doubt that's the case. Ifdef is likely the right answer.
>
>-Andi
>
>--
>ak@...ux.intel.com -- Speaking for myself only.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists