[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <84144f020908121317g64551a2cu1b960f44ed5d0d9@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2009 23:17:54 +0300
From: Pekka Enberg <penberg@...helsinki.fi>
To: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk>
Cc: Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>, Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>,
Ben Dooks <ben-linux@...ff.org>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.arm.linux.org.uk,
David John <davidjon@...ontk.org>,
Erik Mouw <mouw@...linux.org>,
kernel list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
Krzysztof Halasa <khc@...waw.pl>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] MAINTAINERS: Add "L: linux-arm@...r.kernel.org" to ARM
sections
Hi Russell,
On Wed, Aug 12, 2009 at 10:48 PM, Russell King - ARM
Linux<linux@....linux.org.uk> wrote:
> I haven't noticed a great rush of support for Joe's patch, which
> could mean that people here really aren't that bothered - maybe
> they just aren't "open list" zealots like some people seem to be.
I for one support open lists because subscriber-only lists are a PITA
for contributors who send out patches to multiple subsystems. However,
if you (and the rest of the arm people) don't see the value of opening
the list up, why do you expect people to rush to support Joe's patch?
It's you who is losing out on contributors and if you don't see that
(or don't agree), you probably should keep the list subscriber-only,
no?
Pekka
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists