linux-kernel - Re: Help Resource Counters Scale better (v4)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 12 Aug 2009 09:27:40 +0530
From:	Balbir Singh <balbir@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc:	kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com, nishimura@....nes.nec.co.jp,
	kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com, menage@...gle.com,
	prarit@...hat.com, andi.kleen@...el.com, xemul@...nvz.org,
	lizf@...fujitsu.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-mm@...ck.org
Subject: Re: Help Resource Counters Scale better (v4)

* Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org> [2009-08-11 16:31:59]:

> Is this an alternative approach to using percpu_counters, or do we do
> both or do we choose one or the other?  res_counter_charge() really is
> quite sucky.
>

This is an alternative approach, I'll still do the percpu counter
patches, but once the overhead for root is gone, most users not using
this functionality will not see any major overhead. 

-- 
	Balbir
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/