linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] MAINTAINERS: Add "L: linux-arm@...r.kernel.org" to ARM sections

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20090812224319.GC24667@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk>
Date:	Wed, 12 Aug 2009 23:43:19 +0100
From:	Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk>
To:	Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>
Cc:	Pekka Enberg <penberg@...helsinki.fi>,
	Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>, Ben Dooks <ben-linux@...ff.org>,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.arm.linux.org.uk,
	David John <davidjon@...ontk.org>,
	Erik Mouw <mouw@...linux.org>,
	kernel list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
	Krzysztof Halasa <khc@...waw.pl>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] MAINTAINERS: Add "L: linux-arm@...r.kernel.org" to ARM
	sections

On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 12:00:30AM +0200, Pavel Machek wrote:
> Hi!
> 
> > > > I haven't noticed a great rush of support for Joe's patch, which
> > > > could mean that people here really aren't that bothered - maybe
> > > > they just aren't "open list" zealots like some people seem to be.
> > > 
> > > I for one support open lists because subscriber-only lists are a PITA
> > 
> > Let me make this clear, yet again.  The lists are *not* subscriber only
> > lists.  We do NOT reject non-subscriber posts for no reason what so ever
> > (although it does seem to have happened, both Erik and myself both
> > contend that we have never rejected a mailing intentionally without
> > giving a reason - whether the original poster receives that reason is
> > a function of how buggy mailman is.)
> 
> FAQ still states that cc-ing between l-k and lakml is
> unwelcome. Reason why people prefer open lists is that you can cc both
> l-k and the other relevant list.

Yes, because the FAQ tends to be out of date unless someone either
sends me a patch or I actually read it and correct things in there.
The FAQ is more or less something I never read, but end up looking
after.

I'll see about updating it at some point.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/