[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <19075.19867.522323.983427@notabene.brown>
Date: Thu, 13 Aug 2009 09:17:47 +1000
From: Neil Brown <neilb@...e.de>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: sage@...dream.net, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-raid@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] md: avoid use of broken kzalloc mempool
On Tuesday August 11, akpm@...ux-foundation.org wrote:
> On Tue, 4 Aug 2009 08:03:52 +1000 (EST)
> "NeilBrown" <neilb@...e.de> wrote:
>
> > On Tue, August 4, 2009 6:54 am, Sage Weil wrote:
> > > The kzalloc mempool does not re-zero items that have been used and then
> > > returned to the pool. Manually zero the allocated multipath_bh instead.
> > >
> > > CC: linux-raid@...r.kernel.org
> > > CC: Neil Brown <neilb@...e.de>
> > > CC: <stable@...nel.org>
>
> Sage, why did you cc stable@...nel.org? The patch fixes some bug?
> What is it? Why is the fix sufficiently important to warrant
> backporting?
>
> > Acked-by: NeilBrown <neilb@...e.de>
> >
>
> Thanks, I'll merge it once the above is understood.
>
> >
> > In fact, you don't even need the memset. After allocation
> > no assumptions are made about the content of the structure.
> > Every field is immediately initialised except retry_list, which
> > is never accessed until after the object is placed on a list.h list.
> >
> > So this code never needed kzalloc_pool.
>
> Well, that's a bit of a functional change so let us (ie: you ;)) do
> that separately?
Yes, I'll keep an eye out for your change to be merged, then I'll
apply mine.
NeilBrown
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists