[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4A834E75.9060204@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2009 19:21:25 -0400
From: Gregory Haskins <gregory.haskins@...il.com>
To: Anthony Liguori <anthony@...emonkey.ws>
CC: alacrityvm-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net,
alacrityvm-users@...ts.sourceforge.net,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"kvm@...r.kernel.org" <kvm@...r.kernel.org>,
"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: AlacrityVM numbers updated for 31-rc4
Anthony Liguori wrote:
> Gregory Haskins wrote:
>> I re-ran the numbers on 10GE against the actual alacrityvm v0.1 release
>> available in git on kernel.org.
>>
>> I tried to include the newly announced "vhost" driver (Michael Tsirkin)
>> for virtio acceleration, but ran into issues getting the patches to
>> apply.
>>
>> For now, this includes native, virtio-u (virtio-userspace), and venet
>> all running on 31-rc4. If I can resolve the issue with Michaels
>> patches, I will add "virtio-k" (virtio-kernel) to the mix as well. For
>> now, here are the results for 1500mtu:
>>
>> native: 7388Mb/s, 29.8us rtt (33505 tps udp-rr)
>> venet: 3654Mb/s, 56.8us rtt (17600 tps udp-rr)
>> virtio-u: 1955Mb/s, 4016.0us rtt ( 249 tps udp-rr)
>>
>
> Just FYI, the numbers quoted are wrong for virtio-u. Greg's machine
> didn't have high res timers enabled in the kernel. He'll post newer
> numbers later but they're much better than these (venet is still ahead
> though).
>
> Regards,
>
> Anthony Liguori
Anthony is correct. The new numbers after fixing the HRT clock issue are:
virtio-u: 2670Mb/s, 266us rtt (3764 tps udp-rr)
I will update the charts later tonight.
Sorry for the confusion.
-Greg
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (268 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists