linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] MAINTAINERS: Add "L: linux-arm@...r.kernel.org" to ARM sections

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 13 Aug 2009 10:54:26 +0100
From:	Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
To:	Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk>
Cc:	Pekka Enberg <penberg@...helsinki.fi>, Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>,
	Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>, Ben Dooks <ben-linux@...ff.org>,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.arm.linux.org.uk,
	David John <davidjon@...ontk.org>,
	Erik Mouw <mouw@...linux.org>,
	kernel list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
	Krzysztof Halasa <khc@...waw.pl>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] MAINTAINERS: Add "L: linux-arm@...r.kernel.org" to ARM
 sections

On Thu, 13 Aug 2009 10:47:36 +0100
Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk> wrote:

> On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 10:35:11AM +0100, Alan Cox wrote:
> > O> Let me make this clear, yet again.  The lists are *not* subscriber only
> > > lists.  We do NOT reject non-subscriber posts for no reason what so ever
> > > (although it does seem to have happened, both Erik and myself both
> > > contend that we have never rejected a mailing intentionally without
> > > giving a reason - whether the original poster receives that reason is
> > > a function of how buggy mailman is.)
> > 
> > Does it matter one iota whether mailman is rejecting the posts or you
> > are. It's a long standing nuisance. And if the software is that buggy why
> > not move it to vger which works and has its own active maintainers which
> > will free up your time ?
> 
> As I've already pointed out in previous threads, people believe that they
> should talk to me about ARM mailing lists.  Proven, multiple times by
> multiple people.

You are missing the point entirely. Actually with your comment you are
now missing two points

1. The point in the email that you ignored: Nobody cared whether mailman
is buggy or the list admins are not doing their job or the list is badly
configured. They just care it doesn't let them easily cc stuff over. In
reality they probably blame the admins regardless of the real cause.

2. People talk to you on the ARM list because you don't seem to respond
on the vger arm list ?

> Moving them to vger isn't going to change that.  The only effect that
> it'll have is make me frustrated because I'm then constantly bothered
> by people who can't do the sodding research to work out who they should
> be talking to.

Reality check. A mailing list name such as "linux-arm" is a tag attached
to an object, its a handle nothing more. Moving the object behind that
handle to vger as a vger linux-arm list doesn't change things in the way
you wish to pretend.

> > Well if you will hide in your own cupboard under the stairs nobody is
> > going to understand the ARM folks needs. You don't need malice to account
> > for that.
> 
> That's not really fair Alan.
> 
> The issue is not about hiding.  I believe it's about jealousness and
> resentment.

Most folks working on the kernel are far too busy to spend their time on
that, and I'm curious how you could even arrive at such a ludicrous
conclusion - what is the motiviation of this evil plot you see ?

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/