[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <63386a3d0908130415x76993440ifd38e4bcb6a1d07e@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 13 Aug 2009 13:15:06 +0200
From: Linus Walleij <linus.ml.walleij@...il.com>
To: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@...ibm.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
john stultz <johnstul@...ibm.com>,
Daniel Walker <dwalker@...o99.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC][patch 10/12] move NTP adjusted clock multiplier to struct
timekeeper
2009/7/29 Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@...ibm.com>:
> Index: linux-2.6/arch/arm/plat-omap/common.c
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-2.6.orig/arch/arm/plat-omap/common.c
> +++ linux-2.6/arch/arm/plat-omap/common.c
> @@ -256,7 +256,7 @@ unsigned long long sched_clock(void)
> unsigned long long ret;
>
> ret = (unsigned long long)clocksource_32k.read(&clocksource_32k);
> - ret = (ret * clocksource_32k.mult_orig) >> clocksource_32k.shift;
> + ret = (ret * clocksource_32k.mult) >> clocksource_32k.shift;
Doesn't the overall effect of your patch mean that the above can simply be
replaced by
ret = cyc2ns(&clocksource_32k, ret);
Or clocksource_cyc2ns() if that was renamed (I don't have the entire
picture here...)
> return ret;
> }
Yours,
Linus Walleij
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists