linux-kernel - Re: [RFC] PCI: Runtime power management

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.44L0.0908131100440.2940-100000@iolanthe.rowland.org>
Date:	Thu, 13 Aug 2009 11:17:05 -0400 (EDT)
From:	Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>
To:	Matthew Garrett <mjg59@...f.ucam.org>
cc:	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>, Greg KH <gregkh@...e.de>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Linux-pm mailing list <linux-pm@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
	<linux-pci@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-usb@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC] PCI: Runtime power management

On Thu, 13 Aug 2009, Matthew Garrett wrote:

> --- a/drivers/pci/pci-driver.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/pci-driver.c

> +#ifdef CONFIG_PM_RUNTIME
> +
> +static int pci_pm_runtime_suspend(struct device *dev)
> +{
> +	struct pci_dev *pci_dev = to_pci_dev(dev);
> +	struct dev_pm_ops *pm = dev->driver ? dev->driver->pm : NULL;
> +	int error;
> +
> +	device_set_wakeup_enable(dev, 1);

This is a userspace policy parameter.  Kernel code should not alter it.
Instead you should test device_may_wakeup.

> +	error = pci_enable_runtime_wake(pci_dev, true);
> +
> +	if (error)
> +		return -EBUSY;
> +
> +	if (pm && pm->runtime_suspend)
> +		error = pm->runtime_suspend(dev);
> +
> +	if (error)
> +		goto out;
> +
> +	error = pci_pm_suspend(dev);
> +
> +	if (error)
> +		goto resume;
> +
> +	disable_irq(pci_dev->irq);
> +	error = pci_pm_suspend_noirq(dev);
> +	enable_irq(pci_dev->irq);
> +
> +	if (error)
> +		goto resume_noirq;
> +
> +	return 0;
> +
> +resume_noirq:
> +	disable_irq(pci_dev->irq);
> +	pci_pm_resume_noirq(dev);
> +	enable_irq(pci_dev->irq);
> +resume:
> +	pci_pm_resume(dev);
> +out:
> +	pci_enable_runtime_wake(pci_dev, false);
> +	return error;
> +}

The goto statements and unwinding code don't match up.

> +static int pci_pm_runtime_resume(struct device *dev)
> +{
> +	struct pci_dev *pci_dev = to_pci_dev(dev);
> +	struct dev_pm_ops *pm = dev->driver ? dev->driver->pm : NULL;
> +	int error = 0;
> +
> +	disable_irq(pci_dev->irq);
> +	error = pci_pm_resume_noirq(dev);
> +	enable_irq(pci_dev->irq);
> +
> +	if (error)
> +		return error;
> +
> +	error = pci_pm_resume(dev);
> +
> +	if (error)
> +		return error;
> +
> +	if (pm->runtime_resume)
> +		error = pm->runtime_resume(dev);
> +
> +	if (error)
> +		return error;
> +
> +	error = pci_enable_runtime_wake(pci_dev, false);
> +
> +	if (error)
> +		return error;
> +
> +	return 0;
> +}

Log an error message when something goes wrong?

> +static void pci_pm_runtime_idle(struct device *dev)
> +{
> +	struct dev_pm_ops *pm = dev->driver ? dev->driver->pm : NULL;
> +
> +	if (pm && pm->runtime_idle)
> +		pm->runtime_idle(dev);
> +
> +	pm_schedule_suspend(dev, 0);
> +}

This misses the point.  The whole idea of runtime_idle is to tell you 
that the device is idle and might be ready to be suspended.  If you're 
going to call pm_schedule_suspend anyway, there's no reason to invoke 
pm->runtime_idle.

Alan Stern

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/