lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4A843B96.3010200@vflare.org>
Date:	Thu, 13 Aug 2009 21:43:10 +0530
From:	Nitin Gupta <ngupta@...are.org>
To:	Matthew Wilcox <willy@...ux.intel.com>
CC:	Hugh Dickins <hugh.dickins@...cali.co.uk>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
	linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org, linux-ide@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Discard support (was Re: [PATCH] swap: send callback when swap
 slot is freed)

On 08/13/2009 08:43 PM, Matthew Wilcox wrote:

>
> I am planning a complete overhaul of the discard work.  Users can send
> down discard requests as frequently as they like.  The block layer will
> cache them, and invalidate them if writes come through.  Periodically,
> the block layer will send down a TRIM or an UNMAP (depending on the
> underlying device) and get rid of the blocks that have remained unwanted
> in the interim.
>

This batching of discard requests is still sub-optimal for compcache. 
The optimal solution in this case is to get callback *as soon as* a swap 
slot becomes free and this is what this patch does.

I see that it will be difficult to accept this patch since compcache 
seems to be the only user for now. However, this little addition makes a 
*big* difference for the project. Currently, much of memory is wasted to 
store all the stale data.

I will be posting compcache patches for review in next merge window. So, 
maybe this patch can be included now as the first step? The revised 
patch is ready which addresses issues raised during the first review -- 
will post it soon.

Thanks,
Nitin
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ