[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <200908132034.34951.rjw@sisk.pl>
Date: Thu, 13 Aug 2009 20:34:34 +0200
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
To: q-funk@....fi
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Alexander Viro <viro@....linux.org.uk>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Kernel Testers List <kernel-testers@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [Bug #13941] x86 Geode issue
On Thursday 13 August 2009, Martin-Éric Racine wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 5:54 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki<rjw@...k.pl> wrote:
> > On Thursday 13 August 2009, Martin-Éric Racine wrote:
> >> 2009/8/13 Martin-Éric Racine <q-funk@....fi>:
> >> > On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 12:07 PM, Ingo Molnar<mingo@...e.hu> wrote:
> >> >> * Martin-Éric Racine <q-funk@....fi> wrote:
> >> >>> Yes, this bug is still valid.
> >> >>>
> >> >>> Ubuntu kernel team member Leann Ogasawara and I are slowly
> >> >>> bisecting our way through the changes that took place since 2.6.30
> >> >>> to find the commit that introduced this regression. Please stay
> >> >>> tuned.
> >> >>
> >> >> hm, the only outright Geode related commit was:
> >> >>
> >> >> d6c585a: x86: geode: Mark mfgpt irq IRQF_TIMER to prevent resume failure
> >> >>
> >> >> the jpg at:
> >> >>
> >> >> http://launchpadlibrarian.net/28892781/00002.jpg
> >> >>
> >> >> is very out of focus - but what i could decypher suggests a
> >> >> pagefault crash in the VFS code, in generic_delete_inode().
> >>
> >> This one might be a bit better:
> >>
> >> http://launchpadlibrarian.net/30267494/2.6.31-5.24.jpg
Hmm. This looks like a sysfs oops to my untrained eye.
Thanks,
Rafael
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists