linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] Help Resource Counters Scale better (v4.1)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20090813033335.GF5087@balbir.in.ibm.com>
Date:	Thu, 13 Aug 2009 09:03:35 +0530
From:	Balbir Singh <balbir@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To:	Daisuke Nishimura <nishimura@....nes.nec.co.jp>
Cc:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com, kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com,
	menage@...gle.com, prarit@...hat.com, andi.kleen@...el.com,
	xemul@...nvz.org, lizf@...fujitsu.com,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Help Resource Counters Scale better (v4.1)

* nishimura@....nes.nec.co.jp <nishimura@....nes.nec.co.jp> [2009-08-13 10:03:50]:

> > @@ -1855,9 +1883,14 @@ __mem_cgroup_uncharge_common(struct page *page, enum charge_type ctype)
> >  		break;
> >  	}
> >  
> > -	res_counter_uncharge(&mem->res, PAGE_SIZE, &soft_limit_excess);
> > -	if (do_swap_account && (ctype != MEM_CGROUP_CHARGE_TYPE_SWAPOUT))
> > -		res_counter_uncharge(&mem->memsw, PAGE_SIZE, NULL);
> > +	if (!mem_cgroup_is_root(mem)) {
> > +		res_counter_uncharge(&mem->res, PAGE_SIZE, &soft_limit_excess);
> > +		if (do_swap_account &&
> > +				(ctype != MEM_CGROUP_CHARGE_TYPE_SWAPOUT))
> > +			res_counter_uncharge(&mem->memsw, PAGE_SIZE, NULL);
> > +	}
> > +	if (ctype == MEM_CGROUP_CHARGE_TYPE_SWAPOUT && mem_cgroup_is_root(mem))
> > +		mem_cgroup_swap_statistics(mem, true);
> I think mem_cgroup_is_root(mem) would be unnecessary here.
> Otherwise, MEM_CGROUP_STAT_SWAPOUT of groups except root memcgroup wouldn't
> be counted properly.
> 

I think you have a valid point, but it will not impact us currently
since we use SWAPOUT only for root accounting.

> 
> > @@ -2461,10 +2496,26 @@ static u64 mem_cgroup_read(struct cgroup *cont, struct cftype *cft)
> >  	name = MEMFILE_ATTR(cft->private);
> >  	switch (type) {
> >  	case _MEM:
> > -		val = res_counter_read_u64(&mem->res, name);
> > +		if (name == RES_USAGE && mem_cgroup_is_root(mem)) {
> > +			val = mem_cgroup_read_stat(&mem->stat,
> > +					MEM_CGROUP_STAT_CACHE);
> > +			val += mem_cgroup_read_stat(&mem->stat,
> > +					MEM_CGROUP_STAT_RSS);
> > +			val <<= PAGE_SHIFT;
> > +		} else
> > +			val = res_counter_read_u64(&mem->res, name);
> >  		break;
> >  	case _MEMSWAP:
> > -		val = res_counter_read_u64(&mem->memsw, name);
> > +		if (name == RES_USAGE && mem_cgroup_is_root(mem)) {
> > +			val = mem_cgroup_read_stat(&mem->stat,
> > +					MEM_CGROUP_STAT_CACHE);
> > +			val += mem_cgroup_read_stat(&mem->stat,
> > +					MEM_CGROUP_STAT_RSS);
> > +			val += mem_cgroup_read_stat(&mem->stat,
> > +					MEM_CGROUP_STAT_SWAPOUT);
> > +			val <<= PAGE_SHIFT;
> > +		} else
> > +			val = res_counter_read_u64(&mem->memsw, name);
> >  		break;
> >  	default:
> >  		BUG();
> Considering use_hierarchy==1 case in the root memcgroup, shouldn't we use
> mem_cgroup_walk_tree() here to sum up all the children's usage ?
> *.usage_in_bytes show sum of all the children's usage now if use_hierarchy==1.

If memory.use_hiearchy=1, we should use total_stats..right. Let me
send out a newer version for review.


-- 
	Balbir
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/