[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090813063113.GA3508@redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 13 Aug 2009 09:31:13 +0300
From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>
To: Anthony Liguori <anthony@...emonkey.ws>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
"Ira W. Snyder" <iws@...o.caltech.edu>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
kvm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] vhost_net: a kernel-level virtio server
On Wed, Aug 12, 2009 at 02:27:31PM -0500, Anthony Liguori wrote:
> Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>>> As I pointed out earlier, most code in virtio net is asymmetrical: guest
>>> provides buffers, host consumes them. Possibly, one could use virtio
>>> rings in a symmetrical way, but support of existing guest virtio net
>>> means there's almost no shared code.
>>>
>>
>> The trick is to swap the virtqueues instead. virtio-net is actually
>> mostly symmetric in just the same way that the physical wires on a
>> twisted pair ethernet are symmetric (I like how that analogy fits).
>>
>
> It's already been done between two guests. See
> http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel.virtualization/5423
>
> Regards,
>
> Anthony Liguori
Yes, this works by copying data (see PATCH 5/5). Another possibility is
page flipping. Either will kill performance.
--
MST
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists