[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1d3f23370908131701w50f2c550r312b14b2c7f2d12c@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 14 Aug 2009 10:01:34 +1000
From: John Williams <john.williams@...alogix.com>
To: Linux Kernel list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Cc: John Linn <John.Linn@...inx.com>,
Stephen Neuendorffer <stephen.neuendorffer@...inx.com>,
David DeBonis <david.debonis@...inx.com>,
Michal Simek <michal.simek@...alogix.com>,
Grant Likely <grant.likely@...retlab.ca>
Subject: GPIOLIB, GPIO_SYS and port-wide accesses
Hi,
As I see it the gpiolib and sysfs export insists on single bit
accesses even on gpio pins that are located on the same physical
device/port.
A couple of years ago there was mention of port-wide accesses being a
good thing:
http://lkml.indiana.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/0608.0/0731.html
(towards the bottom)
Did anything ever come of that?
Per-bit access is pretty inflexible if you are driving a 7-segment
display or 8-LED bar display, holding lots of file descriptors open
etc, and lots of syscall overhead.
sysfs syntax like
$ echo "240-247" > export
$ echo 255 > gpio240-247/direction (8-bit binary mask - output)
$ echo 255 > gpio240-247/value (all ones)
would be reasonably friendly, obviously the underlying gpiolib would
have to have some notion of coupled ports.
Any thoughts?
John
--
John Williams,
PetaLogix - Linux Solutions for a Reconfigurable World
w: www.petalogix.com p: +61-7-30090663 f: +61-7-30090663
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists