linux-kernel - Re: linux-arm-kernel useless for development (was Re: Your message to Linux-arm-kernel awaits moderator approval)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 14 Aug 2009 13:06:25 +0200
From:	Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>
To:	Russell King <rmk+lkml@....linux.org.uk>
Cc:	kernel list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, davem@...emloft.net,
	mouw@...linux.org
Subject: Re: linux-arm-kernel useless for development (was Re: Your message
	to Linux-arm-kernel awaits moderator approval)

On Thu 2009-08-06 12:55:53, Russell King wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 06, 2009 at 01:02:47PM +0200, Pavel Machek wrote:
> > On Thu 2009-08-06 11:44:21, Russell King wrote:
> > 
> > > It appears the answer to that is no.  People are free to subscribe to
> > > the one on vger, where they won't have to "put up" with me.  However,
> > > it seems that people much prefer to subscribe to my lists, because that
> > > seems to be where the expertise is.
> > > 
> > > Moreover,
> > > 
> > > (a) when ever you have a problem, you go shouting and making public
> > > accusations without trying first to resolve the problem in private.
> > 
> > When I tried asking in private, I was told to stop complaining or loose
> > my mailing list subscription. I'd prefer not to make that mistake again.
> 
> ... in response to your whinging about the "headers matched a filter
> rule" mailman whining.  I had enough of your whinging and whining in
> April, and I've certainly had enough now.  But guess what?  The
> problem eventually got fixed after working out what was going on.

So you are fixing problems with your mailing lists. Cool.

> > > I wonder, do you even know what happened to the message you're whinging
> > > about?  Would you prefer that your message was silently dropped into
> > > /dev/null instead of having a chance of the issue being resolved?  It
> > > strikes me that _that_ would be a better solution than all your
> > > whinging.
> > 
> > So... your solution to broken mailing list is to silence everyone who
> > complains?
> 
> No.  My solution would have been to fix the mailing list had you not
> made this a public issue in an offensive way.

When I asked you privately last time, you threatened unsubscribing
me. I don't want to face that again, so yes I prefer public
communication.
									Pavel
-- 
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/