[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <200908141533.16714.arnd@arndb.de>
Date: Fri, 14 Aug 2009 15:33:16 +0200
From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
To: Michael Schnell <mschnell@...ino.de>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Mike Frysinger <vapier.adi@...il.com>,
Paul Mundt <lethal@...ux-sh.org>,
Michael Kerrisk <mtk.manpages@...il.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, Jakub Jelinek <jakub@...hat.com>,
Thomas Chou <thomas@...ron.com.tw>
Subject: Re: implementing Futex
On Friday 14 August 2009, Michael Schnell wrote:
> Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > The man page says that the last parameter is ignored for op=FUTEX_WAKE,
> > which is correct. The code that you were looking at however is for
> > of=FUTEX_WAKE_OP, which is not documented as of manpages-3.22.
> >
> > It was added by Jakub back in 2005, but if he wrote a documentation
> > for it, it never went into the man pages package. On a similar
> > note, Ingo also added other futex operations that are not documented
> > yet.
> >
>
> Thus in any documented software, the quite complex stuff in
> "futex_atomic_op_inuser", which is provided in several different
> "futex.h" files for all those architectures never is used ?
No, my point was that futex_atomic_op_inuser is indeed used
correctly, it's just not documented.
See http://lwn.net/Articles/148830/ for the initial posting
> Is there any viable use for this ?
glibc heavily uses it for the pthreads implementation.
> Would it not be appropriate either to do a documentation or to remove it ?
Adding documentation, yes.
Arnd <><
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists