linux-kernel - Re: [patch 4/4] ipc: sem optimise simple operations

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <4A85B167.5000803@colorfullife.com>
Date:	Fri, 14 Aug 2009 20:48:07 +0200
From:	Manfred Spraul <manfred@...orfullife.com>
To:	npiggin@...e.de
CC:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Nadia Derbey <Nadia.Derbey@...l.net>,
	Pierre Peiffer <peifferp@...il.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch 4/4] ipc: sem optimise simple operations

On 08/11/2009 01:09 PM, npiggin@...e.de wrote:
> @@ -438,23 +448,94 @@ again:
>   			continue;
>
>   		list_del(&q->list);
> +		if (q->nsops == 1)
> +			list_del(&q->simple_list);
> +		else
> +			sma->complex_count--;
> +
> +		alter = q->alter;
> +		wake_up_sem_queue(q, error);
>    
Unlink approach one: list_del() only if q->nsops!=1.

@@ -532,6 +613,9 @@ static void freeary(struct ipc_namespace
>   	/* Wake up all pending processes and let them fail with EIDRM. */
>   	list_for_each_entry_safe(q, tq,&sma->sem_pending, list) {
>   		list_del(&q->list);
> +		list_del(&q->simple_list);
> +		if (q->nsops>  1)
> +			sma->complex_count--;
>    
Unlink approach two: list_del() even if q->nsops==1.
[i.e.: rely on list_del() on an empty list is permitted].

I would merge that into a helper function.

--
     Manfred
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/