[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20090814.163232.234331420.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Fri, 14 Aug 2009 16:32:32 -0700 (PDT)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: mpm@...enic.com
Cc: Dongdong.deng@...driver.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Bruce.Ashfield@...driver.com,
jason.wessel@...driver.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drivers/net: fixed drivers that support netpoll use
ndo_start_xmit()
From: Matt Mackall <mpm@...enic.com>
Date: Fri, 14 Aug 2009 10:33:39 -0500
> On Fri, 2009-08-14 at 13:12 +0800, DDD wrote:
>> The NETPOLL API requires that interrupts remain disabled in
>> netpoll_send_skb(). The use of spin_lock_irq() and spin_unlock_irq()
>> in the NETPOLL API callbacks causes the interrupts to get enabled and
>> can lead to kernel instability.
>>
>> The solution is to use spin_lock_irqsave() and spin_unlock_restore()
>> to prevent the irqs from getting enabled while in netpoll_send_skb().
...
>> Signed-off-by: Dongdong Deng <dongdong.deng@...driver.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Jason Wessel <jason.wessel@...driver.com>
>> Acked-by: Bruce Ashfield <bruce.ashfield@...driver.com>
>
> Acked-by: Matt Mackall <mpm@...enic.com>
Applied, thanks everyone.
> Perhaps we should also have a WARN_ONCE if start_xmit returns with
> interrupts enabled?
Probably a good idea.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists