[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090814234539.GE27148@parisc-linux.org>
Date: Fri, 14 Aug 2009 17:45:39 -0600
From: Matthew Wilcox <matthew@....cx>
To: Chris Worley <worleys@...il.com>
Cc: Mark Lord <liml@....ca>, Bryan Donlan <bdonlan@...il.com>,
david@...g.hm, Greg Freemyer <greg.freemyer@...il.com>,
Markus Trippelsdorf <markus@...ppelsdorf.de>,
Matthew Wilcox <willy@...ux.intel.com>,
Hugh Dickins <hugh.dickins@...cali.co.uk>,
Nitin Gupta <ngupta@...are.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org, linux-ide@...r.kernel.org,
Linux RAID <linux-raid@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Discard support (was Re: [PATCH] swap: send callback when swap
slot is freed)
On Fri, Aug 14, 2009 at 05:21:32PM -0600, Chris Worley wrote:
> Sooner is better than waiting to coalesce. The longer an LBA is
> inactive, the better for any management scheme. If you wait until
> it's reused, you might as well forgo the advantages of TRIM/UNMAP. If
> a the controller wants to coalesce, let it coalesce.
I'm sorry, you're wrong. There is a tradeoff point, and it's different
for each drive model. Sending down a steady stream of tiny TRIMs is
going to give terrible performance.
--
Matthew Wilcox Intel Open Source Technology Centre
"Bill, look, we understand that you're interested in selling us this
operating system, but compare it to ours. We can't possibly take such
a retrograde step."
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists