[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090814075919.GG19257@buzzloop.caiaq.de>
Date: Fri, 14 Aug 2009 09:59:19 +0200
From: Daniel Mack <daniel@...aq.de>
To: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk>
Cc: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>, Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
Pekka Enberg <penberg@...helsinki.fi>,
Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>, Ben Dooks <ben-linux@...ff.org>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.arm.linux.org.uk,
David John <davidjon@...ontk.org>,
Erik Mouw <mouw@...linux.org>,
kernel list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
Krzysztof Halasa <khc@...waw.pl>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] MAINTAINERS: Add "L: linux-arm@...r.kernel.org" to ARM
sections
On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 12:54:44PM +0100, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 04:08:34AM -0700, Joe Perches wrote:
> > On Thu, 2009-08-13 at 11:35 +0100, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> > > And... have your emails been held for moderation recently?
> >
> > Umm... (while chuckling)
>
> Yes. The reason being is you removed the 'Re:' from the subject
> line but still pressed "reply".
>
> We have an etiquette item which discourages that - we have people
> who like to use the "reply" button to start a completely new and
> unrelated topic of conversation. So the mailing list catches this
> behaviour and holds it for moderation, so we don't end up with
> irrelevent sub-threads tagged on to existing threads in the archives
> (or even in our threaded mail readers.)
One common false positive to this rule is using 'git send-email' with a
message ID as reference. There won't be a 'Re:' in that case.
As just happened to my USB patches some hours ago.
Daniel
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists