lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Sat, 15 Aug 2009 15:21:27 -0700 (PDT)
From:	David Wagner <daw@...berkeley.edu>
To:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Security: information leaks in /proc enable keystroke recovery

At Usenix Security 2009, two researchers announced last week a new
security vulnerability in multi-user Linux systems.  They demonstrated
that one user can, in many cases, recover partial information about
the keystrokes that another user types into applications running on
that system.  For instance, they demonstrate how a malicious user can
recover partial information about SSH passwords typed by other users,
reducing the password search space by a factor of 250-2000x in
their experiments.  Thus, this could facilitate password recovery.

Question: Are there any plans to modify the Linux kernel to defend
against this kind of attack?

The paper is here:

http://www.usenix.org/events/sec09/tech/full_papers/zhang.pdf 

In a nutshell, they exploit the fact that many files in /proc are
world-readable yet contain sensitive information that can leak information
about inter-keystroke timings.  For instance, /proc/$PID/stat reveals the
ESP and EIP registers of the associated process, and is world-readable.
/proc/pid/status is also mentioned as revealing information that could
be exploited in these attacks.

Based on my understanding of their work, it sounds like some of
the information on those files should perhaps not be world-readable.
It's not clear to me that it's reasonable for the kernel to reveal ESP,
EIP, and other sensitive information about process behavior to everyone
on the same system.

Are folks already aware of these vulnerabilities?  Is there any work
underway to try to address the issues identified in the Usenix Security
paper?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ