lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20090815.224843.240484147.anemo@mba.ocn.ne.jp>
Date:	Sat, 15 Aug 2009 22:48:43 +0900 (JST)
From:	Atsushi Nemoto <anemo@....ocn.ne.jp>
To:	Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@...ox.com>, Tejun Heo <htejun@...il.com>
Cc:	linux-ide@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: ata_tf_read_block() question

I have a question on CHS calculation in ata_tf_read_block().

The calculation in ata_tf_read_block() is:
	block = (cyl * dev->heads + head) * dev->sectors + sect;

but ata_build_rw_tf() does:
	track = (u32)block / dev->sectors;
	cyl   = track / dev->heads;
	head  = track % dev->heads;
	sect  = (u32)block % dev->sectors + 1;

It seems inconsistent.  The correct calculation is:
	block = (cyl * dev->heads + head) * dev->sectors + sect - 1;
isn't it?

I don't have any real problem.  Just noticed by code reading.
---
Atsushi Nemoto
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ