linux-kernel - Re: [patch 00/11] Cleanup unload

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20090816144657.GA9549@infradead.org>
Date:	Sun, 16 Aug 2009 10:46:57 -0400
From:	Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
To:	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc:	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
Subject: Re: [patch 00/11] Cleanup unload_nls() calls

On Fri, Aug 14, 2009 at 12:42:36PM -0000, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> While looking through the BKL call sites in fs/* I noticed that most
> callsites of unload_nls() do 
> 
> 	  if (nls) 
> 	     	   unload_nls(nls);
> 
> The patch series moves the NULL pointer check into unload_nls() and
> cleans up the various users.

This looks all good to me.  But I'd just make it a single patch..

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/