[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4A878377.70502@redhat.com>
Date: Sat, 15 Aug 2009 23:56:39 -0400
From: Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>
To: Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@...el.com>
CC: Avi Kivity <avi@...hat.com>,
Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@...hat.com>,
"Dike, Jeffrey G" <jeffrey.g.dike@...el.com>,
"Yu, Wilfred" <wilfred.yu@...el.com>,
"Kleen, Andi" <andi.kleen@...el.com>,
Hugh Dickins <hugh.dickins@...cali.co.uk>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux-foundation.org>,
KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>,
Mel Gorman <mel@....ul.ie>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-mm <linux-mm@...ck.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC] respect the referenced bit of KVM guest pages?
Wu Fengguang wrote:
> Right, but I meant busty page allocations and accesses on them, which
> can make a large continuous segment of referenced pages in LRU list,
> say 50MB. They may or may not be valuable as a whole, however a local
> algorithm may keep the first 4MB and drop the remaining 46MB.
I wonder if the problem is that we simply do not keep a large
enough inactive list in Jeff's test. If we do not, pages do
not have a chance to be referenced again before the reclaim
code comes in.
The cgroup stats should show how many active anon and inactive
anon pages there are in the cgroup.
--
All rights reversed.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists