linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/7] kfifo: move out spinlock

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 17 Aug 2009 11:52:50 +0200
From:	Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
To:	Stefani Seibold <stefani@...bold.net>
Cc:	Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
	Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>,
	Amerigo Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>,
	Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/7] kfifo: move out spinlock

> I think the break is not so hard if you believe. All you have to do is
> to replace or kfifo_get() into kfifo_out_locked() and kfifo_put() into
> kfifo_in_locked() if you really need the old behavior.
> 
> The thing is that we get no progress without changes.

One thing that would be good to ensure is that old unconverted code
gets a clear compile time error, just in case some out of tree
code uses it. Bonus points also for having a short comment in kfifo.h that 
explains how to do the conversion.

Other than that I would be all for getting rid of embedded spinlocks
completely.

-Andi
-- 
ak@...ux.intel.com -- Speaking for myself only.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/