linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/6] kcore clean up and enhance

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20090817115052.d512a294.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
Date:	Mon, 17 Aug 2009 11:50:52 +0900
From:	KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>
To:	Amerigo Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>
Cc:	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	akpm@...ux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/6] kcore clean up and enhance

On Wed, 12 Aug 2009 17:43:09 +0800
Amerigo Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com> wrote:

> On Thu, Aug 06, 2009 at 07:24:16PM +0900, KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki wrote:
> >
> >This patch set is for /proc/kcore. By this,
> >
> > - many per-arch hooks are removed.
> >
> > - /proc/kcore will know really valid physical memory area.
> >
> > - /proc/kcore will be aware of memory hotplug.
> >
> > - /proc/kcore will be architecture independent i.e.
> >   if an arch supports CONFIG_MMU, it can use /proc/kcore.
> >   (if the arch uses usual memory layout.)
> 
> 
> 
> Hi, this version looks fine for me, I can't spot any obvious
> mistakes now.
> 
> I would like to see these patches merged into -mm, so that
> I can test the whole stuff about /proc/kcore.
> 
> Andrew, could you take these?
> 
I'm back. I'll rewrite a rebased one to the newest rc(or mmotm)
and check it.

Thanks,
-Kame

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/