[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090816201606.6e96efc8@infradead.org>
Date: Sun, 16 Aug 2009 20:16:06 -0700
From: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>
To: James Morris <jmorris@...ei.org>
Cc: Theodore Tso <tytso@....edu>,
David Wagner <daw-news@...berkeley.edu>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Security: information leaks in /proc enable keystroke recovery
On Mon, 17 Aug 2009 12:45:45 +1000 (EST)
James Morris <jmorris@...ei.org> wrote:
> On Sun, 16 Aug 2009, Theodore Tso wrote:
>
> > On Mon, Aug 17, 2009 at 12:31:38AM +0000, David Wagner wrote:
> > >
> > > OK. What about this:
> > >
> > > (a) Remove ESP and EIP from /proc/$pid/stat{,us} entirely. Put
> > > them in some other file that is only readable by root and by the
> > > owner of the process, but is not world-readable. We know that
> > > ESP and EIP can be used for keystroke recovery, and they are not
> > > usually used by administrators, so the first step is to lock them
> > > down tightly: there is no downside.
> >
> > Agreed.
>
> It might be best to require a capability for this if not root.
>
> The candidates seem to be CAP_SYS_ADMIN and CAP_SYS_PTRACE.
I would suggest we just use the "can ptrace" permission function
altogether... (after all, if you can ptrace an app you already own all
its keys)
--
Arjan van de Ven Intel Open Source Technology Centre
For development, discussion and tips for power savings,
visit http://www.lesswatts.org
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists