[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.2.00.0908171943450.2782@localhost.localdomain>
Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2009 19:46:49 +0200 (CEST)
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To: Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@...tta.com>
cc: john stultz <johnstul@...ibm.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: clocksource changes in 2.6.31 - possible regression
On Mon, 17 Aug 2009, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> The following commit causes a change for kernels built with HRT but
> not actually using HRT. I typically use the generic kernel we ship
> on test machines, and that kernel has NOHZ and HRT (for power savings/virt
> and HRT for QoS), but I want to be able to enable TSC as a clock source
> when doing performance tests with pktgen.
>
> The machine in question is a several year old Opteron box, that
> normally reports clocksources: acpi_pm jiffies tsc
> but now with 2.6.31-rc6, it only has acpi_pm.
>
> Since HRT/NOHZ is not really runtime configurable, I think the
> proper behavior is:
Isn't highres=off resp. nohz=off on the kernel command line not good
enough ?
> * kernel reports all possible clocksources and chooses the best
> by default
> * if user demands a different clocksource, the kernel should use that
> but degrade if necessary: ie. high-res timers have less (maybe even
> only HZ accuracy), and nohz should be automatically disabled if
> needed
We never implemented to back out from highres/nohz and I have no urge
to do so :)
Thanks,
tglx
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists